Did the OP say he/she needed HFS+ served to clients post-new solution? Or that they do currently and are experiencing growing pains and need to resolve with something? I piped up since I interpreted the latter. In our case, we dont expose LUNs to clients; there is _not_ HFS+ on the blocks of the filers.
Cheers. On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Jason Healy <jhe...@logn.net> wrote: > On May 12, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Nick Silkey wrote: > >> 1.) NetApp >> >> 2.) snaps to TSM via NDMP from SnapMirror dest. > > I'm not super-familiar with NetApp; how do you serve the HFS+ storage? Does > the NetApp box serve AFP directly, or do you connect it to an OS X server > head end that reshares the storage? > > If the latter, how do you ensure a consistent filesystem when you take the > snapshots? OS X regrettably doesn't include any kind of file system > "freeze", so we've been struggling with this... > > Thanks, > > Jason > > -- > Jason Healy | jhe...@logn.net | http://www.logn.net/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list Tech@lopsa.org http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
