On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 04:28:10PM +0200, Dariusz Swiderski wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Dariusz Swiderski wrote: > > > On Jun 24, 2009, at 2:30 AM, Brad wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:06:34PM -0000, sfi...@kefir.sfires.net wrote: > > > > hi, > > > > > > > > following diff brings support for ICH10 R BM LF chip as well, basic > > > > tests > > > > done by matthew at dempsky org (thanks). > > > > no changes to the code except for binging in new defines > > > > > > > > (this is again a patch for my previous patch for i82574L > > > > > > Here is a newer diff with a few more additions.. > > > > > > - Put in the rest of the missing ICH9 and ICH10 PCI id's. > > > - Some minor changes to deal with the BME1000 rev 2 PHY. > > > - The initial bits to deal with the em_ich10lan MAC for the > > > other ICH10 chipsets, which is similar to ICH8 / 9. > > > - Some minor formatting nits with the for loop in the > > > PHY probing code. > > > > > > Please test if you have a system with an Ethernet chipset of > > > the model ICH9 BM or any ICH10 model. > > > > > > > hi, ill test it on my ICH10_R_BM_LF, unfotunatly i dont have any ICH10_D_* > > a few comments inline :) > > > > hi, > > following is a diif that implements my remarks to brad's mail. > this works properly on ICH10_R_BM, should work on other ICH10_R chips > and on ICH_9_BM. > > if anyone could test it on a ICH10_D_* device, that would be great :) > > i've tested this for half a day on clean and vlan configuration, looks ok >
To be clear this must be tested on many em(4) chips especially the ICH variants because it is more important that this does not break setups that are currently working. -- :wq Claudio
