On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Jason McIntyre <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 01:36:35PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: >> I took a few more editorial liberties here, but on the whole I don't think >> we need to spell out "IEEE 802.11-based wireless network interfaces" every >> time we're talking about one. >> > > watch out - i already stomped on the options blurb. some comments inline > on the wireless part.
Committed after merge. One choice where we apparently took different directions was pseudo-device vs interface. I left it as interface following your changes, although we may want to make the distinction. A wireless interface could be one of many (wi, iwn, wpi, ral, ...) but there's only one carp pseudo-device. Thoughts?
