On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:57:36AM +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:30:25 +0200
> Jakob Schlyter <ja...@openbsd.org> wrote:
>
> > On 23 aug 2010, at 04.16, patrick keshishian wrote:
> >
> > > Is the idea to replace bind altogether from base? If so, my initial
> > searching shows NSD doesn't support caching nor views (although, my
> > googling skills suck). Are these being considered?
> >
> > The plan is that Unbound will be imported as a caching recursive name
> > server. Neither of them has support for views and I have no intention
> > of retrofitting that.
> >
> > jakob
> >
> There is something I never understand: why change more for less?
> i.e. why change bind which is feature reach and mature for nsd/unbound,
> that doesn't have 2/3 of bind features.
> and after all, it is not even a project developed under openbsd
> umbrella...
>
> --
> With best regards,
> Gregory Edigarov
More features does not mean better.
-Otto
