On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote: > On 2010/08/25 11:57, Gregory Edigarov wrote: >> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:30:25 +0200 >> Jakob Schlyter <ja...@openbsd.org> wrote: >> >> > On 23 aug 2010, at 04.16, patrick keshishian wrote: >> > >> > > Is the idea to replace bind altogether from base? If so, my initial >> > searching shows NSD doesn't support caching nor views (although, my >> > googling skills suck). Are these being considered? >> > >> > The plan is that Unbound will be imported as a caching recursive name >> > server. Neither of them has support for views and I have no intention >> > of retrofitting that. >> > >> > jakob >> > >> There is something I never understand: why change more for less? >> i.e. why change bind which is feature reach and mature > > mature - eh? they keep rewriting it... > here's the latest incarnation: > > http://bind10.isc.org/wiki/GettingStartedBIND10Development
is that for real? --patrick
