On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:23:08 +0100 (CET) David Vasek wrote: > I am fully aware that it is not always completly exact, and but on the > other hand the CPU clock rate doesn't change immediately, it takes at least > 5 seconds to drop/rise after the CPU load changes. At least on my Pentium-M > based Thinkpad, where I run apmd -C. I've seen an intel tool just for this job showing the cpu scaled up for a second at a time.
>Much better displaying this than nothing, I believe. Sustained is certainly more important to a process monitor normal usage, when batteries don't matter.
