On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 09:38:06PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 05:46:48PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 05:09:25PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:30:15PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > > I looked through some of the diffs and noted your are introducing a
> > > > race in calendar_fifo.diff. Why are you changing this code?
> > > 
> > > Because the old code blocks if a named pipe is used as a calendar file, a 
> > > bug
> > > report is here:
> > > 
> > > http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bsdmainutils/+bug/357055
> > > 
> > > Michael
> > > -- 
> > > Michael Meskes
> > > Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
> > > Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
> > > Jabber: michael.meskes at googlemail dot com
> > > VfL Borussia! ForC'a BarC'a! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
> > 
> > 
> > Introducing a race is never the right solution, imo.
> > 
> > By the way, your fix does not catch an included file being a fifo
> > either. So while introducing a race, it actually does not fix the
> > problem. 
> 
> With a hint from Paul Jantzen I did test this a bit further.  There's

That is, Paul Janzen, sorry about that.

> code to avoid having a child runing too long. If you have 20s
> patience, you'll see this:
> 
> calendar: uid 1000 did not finish in time
> 
> So imo, the debian diff not only is wrong, but it also tries to solve a
> problem that isn't actually a problem.
> 
>       -Otto

Reply via email to