On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:38:35AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 09:41:08PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > With a hint from Paul Jantzen I did test this a bit further. There's
> >
> > That is, Paul Janzen, sorry about that.
> >
> > > code to avoid having a child runing too long. If you have 20s
> > > patience, you'll see this:
> > >
> > > calendar: uid 1000 did not finish in time
>
> After reading Paul's explanation I found my mistake. The fix works great for
> calendar -a but not if you call calendar directly on the named pipe. Of course
> the latter is not really a problem, so I'm going to remove that patch from our
> sources.
>
> Thanks for the explanations.
>
> Any ideas about the other patches?
I don't think I have a chance to look at them the coming time.
Any other volunteer here?
-Otto
