* Thomas Pfaff <[email protected]> [120608 23:06]: > On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 13:57:35 -0400 > Okan Demirmen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri 2012.06.08 at 19:40 +0200, Thomas Pfaff wrote: > > > On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 21:07:13 +0400 > > > Alexander Polakov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > I'd like to start a discussion about adding tiling to cwm with > > > > these two diffs. > > > > > > I don't want it ;-) > > > > > > If I wanted a tiling window manager I'd install one of the many > > > already available. Please keep cwm clean and simple, as it is. > > > > It's not being dropped as an idea at all. Defaults will not change > > however. > > > > Doing this means more code (more now and definitely more to come), > more documentation, more configuration options, more to learn, more > more more.
It adds about hundred lines of code and one binding now. You are not obliged to learn and use every possible keyboard binding, are you? > I appreciate that the defaults would stay the same, but really, > what is the point in doing this? cwm can't be everything to > everyone. The point is: when you want tiling from time to time, it's impractical to switch to a tiling window manager. -- Alexander Polakov | plhk.ru
