On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 16:19, Stuart Henderson wrote: > yes, that's older - stsp fixed one problem with it since then...
Oh, missed that. Good to know. > Hmm. Looking at the number of bytes in the error message which matches > what's seen on anoncvs.usa and differs to my server... Todd, does the > copy in your chroot pre-date this commit? Sweet. One problem solved. Sounds like the remaining issue is internal fragmentation, possibly exacerbated by randomization. How old is your cvs binary? I'm wondering if the realloc fixes I made last release have any effect. And of course, I think you can always up the ulimit.
