On Thu, 2 May 2013, Franco Fichtner wrote:

> as stated before, breaking down complexity to the bare minimum is my
> requirement for this to be happening at all.  You all get to be the
> judges.  I'm just trying to work on something worth doing.

Well, bare minimum complexity per-protocol * large_number_of_protocols =
a lot of complexity. The incentive is always going to be to add more
protocols and never retire them.

Also, doesn't IPPROTO_DIVERT or SO_BINDANY+SO_SPLICE allow you to do
near zero-overhead DPI completely in userspace?


Reply via email to