On 27 August 2013 13:39, Martin Pieuchot <mpieuc...@nolizard.org> wrote:
> I think that's the right approach but the current code generating
> interfaces indexes is too clever from my point of view, it tries
> to reuse the last index if possible.  This could lead to some
> funny races if we detach and reattach an interface before the
> task get scheduled.
>
> So I'm ok with your diff if we avoid to reuse the last index too
> soon.  Diff below does that.
>

i'm ok with this change.

Reply via email to