On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 01:54:34PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > On 27 August 2013 13:39, Martin Pieuchot <mpieuc...@nolizard.org> wrote: > > I think that's the right approach but the current code generating > > interfaces indexes is too clever from my point of view, it tries > > to reuse the last index if possible. This could lead to some > > funny races if we detach and reattach an interface before the > > task get scheduled. > > > > So I'm ok with your diff if we avoid to reuse the last index too > > soon. Diff below does that. > > > > i'm ok with this change. >
I like that tweak too. Makes me feel warm and safe. .... Ken
