Can you explain me what's the problem with m'y configuration ? I don't see what is the problem.
Loïc Blot, Ingénieur systèmes UNIX, Sécurité et Réseaux http://www.unix-experience.fr Chris Cappuccio <ch...@nmedia.net> a écrit : >Lo?c BLOT [loic.b...@unix-experience.fr] wrote: >> Hello sven, >> it's not a routing table problem, it's only a modification on route >> priorities, it's not the same thing. > >The two of you are solving totally different problems. > >> Here is my example at work: >> >> I have BGP on the WAN, OSPF for my LAN (+ over GRE tunnels) and RIP to >> my CISCO catalyst 45XX. >> >> The problem is simple. I have two routers in this configuration. OSPF is >> prior on RIP. routes obtained by RIP are redistributed on OSPF (because >> my remote sites must know them). But OSPF is prior than RIP and then the >> two border routers want to pass by the other instead of using the RIP >> route. >> I have the same problem with BGP. default route is prior on OSPF than >> BGP. Then BGP must be prior on OSPF to don't loop default route between >> the two routers. > >You don't need a new knob in the system to fix this. > >You need to fix your configuration.
