Hello, that's powerful but my improvement isn't for this use. It's only an improvement to route packets correctly, not dispatch charge.
I'll give you a concrete example this evening. Loïc Blot, Ingénieur systèmes UNIX, Sécurité et Réseaux http://www.unix-experience.fr Stuart Henderson <st...@openbsd.org> a écrit : >On 2013/11/01 19:57, sven falempin wrote: >> FreeBSD propose to have a specific routing table for a process, which is >> even more powerful. >> When the router has multiple gateway i guess when a source address is >> choose the route should be chosen given that. Nothing more. >> >> What use of this <<improvement>> do you imagine ?, of course you may want >> this traffic over this network(low latency) and the other one on >> another(high badnwith), put you may use pf for this, or specific route for >> the services. >> >> Writing about this make me think you want a route that <select> on the PORT >> instead of the IP. Is this madness ??? > >This is also known as "policy based routing". I've being doing this with >"route-to" in PF for ages, or alternatively you can use multiple route tables >and "rtable" in PF to push certain traffic to using a certain table (either >based on port number, or source address, or UID if it's a connection from >the local machine, etc). >
