On 2014/02/10 18:42, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> Em 10-02-2014 18:28, Mark Kettenis escreveu:
> >> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:05:38 -0200
> >> From: Giancarlo Razzolini <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> As mentioned before on misc@, some user got confused and copied the
> >> entire rc.conf file to rc.conf.local and then proceeded editing it. This
> >> patch brings the rc.conf man page closer to the text that is in the
> >> OpenBSD faq. Hopefully it will help newcomers avoiding this mistake.
> > I think your new text is not an improvement.
> >
> >> Index: share/man/man8/rc.conf.8
> >> ===================================================================
> >> RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man8/rc.conf.8,v
> >> retrieving revision 1.20
> >> diff -u -p -u -r1.20 rc.conf.8
> >> --- share/man/man8/rc.conf.8    17 Mar 2012 14:46:40 -0000      1.20
> >> +++ share/man/man8/rc.conf.8    10 Feb 2014 19:59:00 -0000
> >> @@ -45,11 +45,13 @@ in the
> >>  series in order to set shell variables used therein
> >>  to control the behaviour of the scripts.
> >>  .Pp
> >> -It is advisable to leave
> >> +We strongly suggest you do not alter
> >>  .Nm rc.conf
> >> -untouched, and instead create and edit a new
> >> +itself. Instead create and edit a new
> >>  .Nm rc.conf.local
> >> -file.
> >> +file and copy only the variables you wish to change from
> >> +.Nm rc.conf
> >> +and adjust them as you like.
> >>  Variables set in this file will override variables previously set in
> >>  .Nm rc.conf .
> >>  .Pp
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> Giancarlo Razzolini
> >> GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
> >>
> >>
> The text on the faq should be revised then. This patch only makes the
> text on the man page closer to the faq. I believe that the man pages are
> to be considered the de facto source for documentation, not the other
> way around. What's your suggestion for the text?

The existing text, "Create and edit a _new_ rc.conf.local file" seems
fine to me - man pages are generally non-verbose - if copying was intended,
the manual would have said so.

The faq is more chatty, and I don't see a problem with the faq's text in
this area either..

Reply via email to