Em 05-03-2014 23:17, Theo de Raadt escreveu: >> But I believe, not have looked much at the code yet, that the kexec() >> approach would be simpler than implementing the pivot_root(). > Well, certainly less issues to deal with in C code. Instead you'll be > running up against debugging things relating to that file called > locore.S ... Yes, I was looking at this file a few moments before you e-mail arrived. Seems some pretty scary asm stuff. Nevertheless, I'm still willing to take a look at it. So everybody agrees that the kexec() approach is the best one?
Cheers, -- Giancarlo Razzolini GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
