On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 20:12, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > A better patch is probably the following which also increases the size > of the buffer to at least 64k:
Agreed.
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 20:12, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > A better patch is probably the following which also increases the size > of the buffer to at least 64k:
Agreed.