On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Mark Kettenis <mark.kette...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > Solaris documents MAP_ANON in its man page, and defines MAP_ANONYMOUS > as MAP_ANON for source compatibility.
Yep, but what about it? Are you suggesting that should affect POSIX's standardization, or that we should do the same thing? I suspect if POSIX standardizes MAP_ANONYMOUS, that Solaris would switch to documenting MAP_ANONYMOUS and providing MAP_ANON for source compat, no?
