Why haven't you left? Please leave.
> On Sat, 2014-07-12 at 23:58 -0700, William Orr wrote: > > wrt. auditing it, should we send patches here? Or upstream? > > I'd send them both places, if they apply cleanly to both sets of code. > Otherwise, send them here. I'd love to be proven wrong about the > maintainers not really giving a shit about the users, and accepting > packages which make gopher browsing "more secure" or "improve the code > quality" would help. > > BTW, I forgot to ask, where are the exploits for this poor quality code? > i.e. if I'm browsing a gopher site with the current Lynx as root, what > exactly do I have to stumble upon to get "owned?" Or is it just a "this > is ugly in a few places" kind of vague feeling by some devs? I have a > feeling there aren't any (exploits), but I thought I'd ask anyway. > > -- > Shawn K. Quinn <skqu...@rushpost.com> >
