On 2014/07/16 09:53, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote: > Hm, no, .xinitrc itself is the process that calls fork etc since it uses a > lib that does this.
Do you mean that you have replaced .xinitrc, which is documented as a file that should be a shell script, with binary object code? If so, the solution is obvious. > >You should ask your legal department what they think that means other > >than "we're idiots" when attached to messages to archived mailing lists. > The legal department knows what a mailing list is. Mails are sent out to > consumers, those are the (final) recipients. The mailing list is sent not just to people, but also gateways, list archives and maybe other strange things. I see no attempt to prevent that (x-no-archive) so perhaps you are in violation of your company's own rules?
