On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 9:14 AM, frantisek holop <min...@obiit.org> wrote:
> is there a reason why this check should be done twice? > If the code is inextricable, check the history of how it got that way. In this case, there was a mostly mechanical elimination of unnecessary __BSD_VISIBLE clauses which changed different conditions to the same condition; I missed that those two ended up the same. No semantic <shurg> I'll commit this after unlock... Philip Guenther
