On 19/08/14 2:19 PM, Brad Smith wrote:
On 18/08/14 6:24 PM, David Gwynne wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 02:01:15PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
i think i'll try to find the sk at work and wire it up. its just
annoying cos im pretty sure its sr optics with sc connectors.
thanks for testing.
how's this one?
Only running regular MTU traffic so far but the NIC at least works and
beating on it I haven't seen any noticeable issues so far. I'll see if
I can do some test with Jumbos a little later on today.
sk0 9020 19 2 256 19
sk0 1500 <Link> 00:00:5a:98:b9:c0 29810991 0 23786214 0 0
skc0 at pci0 dev 5 function 0 "Schneider & Koch SK-98xx" rev 0x13,
GEnesis (0x0): ivec 0x784
sk0 at skc0 port A: address 00:00:5a:98:b9:c0
brgphy0 at sk0 phy 1: BCM5400 1000baseT PHY, rev. 7
Some minor cosmetic issues I noticed while diff'ing the two revisions
of the diff...
m->m_len = m->m_pkthdr.len = SK_JLEN;
has spaces instead of a tab and the whitespace after if_rxr_ioctl().
Running either netrate or tcpbench targetted at the test system and
its still working Ok. No packet loss.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
