On 24 November 2014 at 17:20, Mike Belopuhov <m...@belopuhov.com> wrote: > On 24 November 2014 at 16:42, Mike Belopuhov <m...@belopuhov.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've been trying to fix a bug in tcpdump but the rottenness >> of the current code base with it's horrendous APIs is just >> getting in the way. What if we trimmed it a bit, say killed >> all those pesky 'register' values, kill protocols that we >> cannot really test (appletalk, fddi, etc.), kill dissectors >> that are barely implemented (krb for instance). Would anyone >> be against this? Does anyone have any plans to sync it up >> with the upstream? >> >> Here's a 91K diff to deregister tcpdump. >> http://www.vantronix.net/~mike/tcpdump-deregister.diff >> >> OK? > > http://www.vantronix.net/~mike/tcpdump-atm.diff > http://www.vantronix.net/~mike/tcpdump-fddi.diff > http://www.vantronix.net/~mike/tcpdump-slip.diff > > SLIP diff has an added benefit that /usr/include/net/slip.h > will no longer be needed.
AppleTalk? http://www.vantronix.net/~mike/tcpdump-atalk.diff DECnet? http://www.vantronix.net/~mike/tcpdump-decnet.diff
