On 24 November 2014 at 16:42, Mike Belopuhov <m...@belopuhov.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to fix a bug in tcpdump but the rottenness
> of the current code base with it's horrendous APIs is just
> getting in the way.  What if we trimmed it a bit, say killed
> all those pesky 'register' values, kill protocols that we
> cannot really test (appletalk, fddi, etc.), kill dissectors
> that are barely implemented (krb for instance).  Would anyone
> be against this?  Does anyone have any plans to sync it up
> with the upstream?
>
> Here's a 91K diff to deregister tcpdump.
> http://www.vantronix.net/~mike/tcpdump-deregister.diff
>
> OK?

Apparently the answer is no.  I'm withdrawing all diffs.

Reply via email to