Hello tech, Is there a particular reason why that path hasn't been committed? It's not in the cvs tree and the bug is reproducible on the latest snapshot. It's the first patch we are trying to commit and we might not understand some internal development mechanics.
Tuesday, December 2, 2014, 12:21:40 PM, Otto wrote: OM> On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 01:03:53PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 07:47, Boris Goldberg wrote: >> > Hello Otto, >> > >> > Tuesday, December 2, 2014, 2:14:11 AM, you wrote: >> > >> > OM> Cool, but your mailer mangled the diff. Here it is for current. >> > >> > Thanks. How was it mangled? Looks fine in the Daily digest. >> > I wanted to attach a text file, but was afraid the list engine would >> > strip it. >> >> I think a mangled diff is better than no diff. If it's small, we can >> hand apply it. If it's large, we'll work something out. (Use a >> different mail client. Trying reading the file in vs pasting it, if >> that's an option. Or upload the patch file to someplace.) OM> I applied the diff with patch -l and then corrected the indenting. -- Best regards, Boris mailto:[email protected]
