On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 02:37:58PM -0600, Boris Goldberg wrote:
> Hello tech,
>
> Is there a particular reason why that path hasn't been committed? It's
> not in the cvs tree and the bug is reproducible on the latest snapshot.
> It's the first patch we are trying to commit and we might not understand
> some internal development mechanics.
Nope, this is just a case of slacking. Not a lot of developers are
really intersted in quota's. But I'll try to push this and (the
other) a bit.
-Otto
>
>
> Tuesday, December 2, 2014, 12:21:40 PM, Otto wrote:
>
> OM> On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 01:03:53PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
> >> On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 07:47, Boris Goldberg wrote:
> >> > Hello Otto,
> >> >
> >> > Tuesday, December 2, 2014, 2:14:11 AM, you wrote:
> >> >
> >> > OM> Cool, but your mailer mangled the diff. Here it is for current.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks. How was it mangled? Looks fine in the Daily digest.
> >> > I wanted to attach a text file, but was afraid the list engine would
> >> > strip it.
> >>
> >> I think a mangled diff is better than no diff. If it's small, we can
> >> hand apply it. If it's large, we'll work something out. (Use a
> >> different mail client. Trying reading the file in vs pasting it, if
> >> that's an option. Or upload the patch file to someplace.)
>
> OM> I applied the diff with patch -l and then corrected the indenting.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Boris mailto:[email protected]
