On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:57:57PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > I had to think about it, it's not obvious. I wouldn't be opposed to changing > them all to a/b/g/n ... (or a/b/g to avoid getting peoples' hopes up ;-)
Doesn't that line always describe what the hardware can do? I'm in favour of a/b/g/n FWIW.
