On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 11:23:10PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Then the question is do we want a/ac/b/g/n for iwm, which is a bit of a > mouthful...
Still fits 80 columns so I don't see why not.
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 11:23:10PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Then the question is do we want a/ac/b/g/n for iwm, which is a bit of a > mouthful...
Still fits 80 columns so I don't see why not.