> I’ve recently discovered OpenBSD after using Linux for more than 15 years.  

Long time, no see? And you blogged and achieved your goal of... making
yourself expressed, critically on your own controlled web space.

> I wrote 
> a blog article with my impressions and some other users suggested me to patch 
> faq9.html to help other users migrating.   

Without reading much of the documentation to gain reasonable production
usage, you're trying to mend the OpenBSD site to say it is lacking
something that you thought worth having according to your current
limited to Linux experience.

Never occurred to you it may be intentional?

> This patch is regarding the fact that there are no binary updates, which is a 
> given thing
> in most Linux distributions, and some tips on how to keep the system updated. 
>  

And you consider this a service to other Linux long time users? Or a
way to try push some notion of yours - criticise and try to lobby for
some other entity's interests.

> Since English is not my first language, before merging the patch, please make 
> sure the 
> wording is proper.  

The pushing of binary patches notion is not appropriate.

For a project that provides binary base OS and binary packages for ports
on multiple architectures, and signed distribution of base and
packages, before anyone else adopted these impressive achievements, you
think in your own universe (and your advisor's) this group is resource
constrained and incapable of providing binary patches to current and
stable?

Read the docs, don't be lazy and overly assuming. You're polluting the
Internet with incorrect information which is a disservice to both
newcomers from Linux and to the OpenBSD community.

> If you think the issue may be interesting to elaborate on, I could write a 
> guide of improve
> on stable.html to help newcomers adapt to this method of keeping up to date.  

You're actually trying to scare people off, because you can't handle
the lean and effective process of managing OpenBSD, justifying
this with the unconfirmed fact you were "advised" by somebody.

Realistically, you could have consulted off list before trying this
stunt.

Reply via email to