On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 02:41:16AM +0300, [email protected] wrote: > > Lack of > > resources is about the only good reason there is for not providing > > binary updates. > > That's not true. > > Further, base + packages are updated frequently in snapshots, which is > exactly a binary upgrade path for users without worry. > > This works exceedingly well and is well stated in the following current > and stable pages.
You're an idiot. Work on current is something that naturally occurs. It does not mean there are enough resources to *duplicate that work* and do the same on stable. I don't understand how you can be so stupid, especially since you admitted in a further email to using OpenBSD for years. Dude, it's well known and documented that there aren't enough people around to - figure out what needs to be committed to stable - build the resulting pieces (which *requires* an extra set of machines that run stable) - push them out. Basically, if you do that, you take away from the work being done on current. We're already stretched thin enough as-is.
