Todd C. Miller wrote: > On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 23:26:53 +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > > looks good to me, any other ok? > > > > null is serious poo and really needs to go as well > > Beware! Some of these values are used in pointer comparisons so > I'm not sure it is same to remove them. > > I don't see any comparisons with newline so it should be safe > to remove.
Indeed. This is why null is less trivial than the other two.
