Hi On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 04:33:07PM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote: > On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 23:26:53 +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > > > looks good to me, any other ok? > > > > null is serious poo and really needs to go as well > > Beware! Some of these values are used in pointer comparisons so > I'm not sure it is same to remove them.
Yes, that's what I meant :-). Possibly they can be replaced by things like *p != '\0', but it is complicated trying to work out if it is alright that any empty string can be the same as null. > I don't see any comparisons with newline so it should be safe > to remove. ok then?
