Todd C. Miller wrote: > On Michael McConville wrote: > > To be (far) more specific, it's used to enable the 'e', 'g', and 'f' > > fields of ksh's vfprintf() clone. On one hand, this can't be too > > important if it was disabled for >10 years. On the other, the code > > at least compiles... > > When I last checked the FP code for ksh's builtin printf was not > correct/complete. Once upon a I took a stab at replacing ksh's > mini-stdio with the libc one but never got it working 100%.
I'm planning on trying it. If you want to work with me, let me know. Either way, I'd be interested to see your diffs if you still have them.
