On 2016/02/01 15:02, Joerg Jung wrote: > > > On 01 Feb 2016, at 14:53, Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > moved from misc. > > > > On 2016-01-28, Antoine Jacoutot <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Well, we "tradionally" had setproctitle("[priv]") in the parent. I > >>> changed the tradition to setproctitle("parent"). > >>> > >>> I have no objections with changing this in the parent (but keeping the > >>> setproctitles in the children) to either the default (all command line > >>> flags) or to something like setproctitle("parent, %s", conffile). > >>> Command line flags suck and I don't think that -d or -v would be > >>> helpful in the output, so I prefer the latter. > >> > >> "-v" is helpful at least for rc.d which needs to match the full args list > >> by default > >> > >>> All rc scripts would have to be adjusted by somebody with better rc-fu. > >> > >> Actually if things are properly done, the non default pexp line in the > >> rc.d scripts should just be removed and that's it. > >> > > > > Here it is for the majority of base daemons. I've left ypldap for now, > > the rc script matches "ldap client" not "parent". radiusd already leaves > > the parent process title as-is (the setproctitle("[main]") are separate > > processes). > > > > OK? > > ok jung@ > > What about smtpd, should be similar, no?
Ah yes, well spotted. Missed in my grep because setproctitle isn't called directly with the name, but in config_process() from a string instead.
