On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 07:24:39PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2016/02/01 15:02, Joerg Jung wrote: > > What about smtpd, should be similar, no? > > This would do the trick. It loses the getrlimit/setrlimit dance that > config_process() normally does, but I'm not sure if that is really > needed for the parent process anyway (mine only has 11 FDs so it's > not in any danger of running out).
I think that is fine and makes sense to me, ok jung@ But please wait for Gilles to comment. > Index: etc/rc.d/smtpd > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/etc/rc.d/smtpd,v > retrieving revision 1.5 > diff -u -p -r1.5 smtpd > --- etc/rc.d/smtpd 26 Dec 2015 09:55:15 -0000 1.5 > +++ etc/rc.d/smtpd 1 Feb 2016 19:22:33 -0000 > @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ daemon="/usr/sbin/smtpd" > > . /etc/rc.d/rc.subr > > -pexp="smtpd: \[priv\]" > rc_reload=NO > > rc_cmd $1 > Index: usr.sbin/smtpd/smtpd.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/smtpd.c,v > retrieving revision 1.272 > diff -u -p -r1.272 smtpd.c > --- usr.sbin/smtpd/smtpd.c 27 Jan 2016 12:46:03 -0000 1.272 > +++ usr.sbin/smtpd/smtpd.c 1 Feb 2016 19:22:33 -0000 > @@ -667,8 +667,6 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[]) > > fork_peers(); > > - config_process(PROC_PARENT); > - > imsg_callback = parent_imsg; > event_init(); > >
