On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 15:29:27 +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > We'd like to rename the 'faulty' listing to 'failed'. > i.e. rcctl ls failed > > 'faulty' does sound a bit weird and is not obvious to remember. > Now the question is should we keep supporting the 'faulty' keyword or not? > I'm not in favor of adding a knob especially when it's just an alias; that'd > also mean documenting it.
I like this. - todd
