On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 08:22:31AM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote: > On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 15:29:27 +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > > We'd like to rename the 'faulty' listing to 'failed'. > > i.e. rcctl ls failed > > > > 'faulty' does sound a bit weird and is not obvious to remember. > > Now the question is should we keep supporting the 'faulty' keyword or not? > > I'm not in favor of adding a knob especially when it's just an alias; > > that'd > > also mean documenting it. > > I like this.
Me too.
