Theo de Raadt: > I've pointed out that people identify the purpose of the file in various ways. > You wish to basically throw that out?
All I say is that file(1) is unreliable by design. And I don't think one needs to care about it too much just because someone got used to it. Personally I consider option to have no comment useful. More useful than looking at 'this is signified something' kind of message. > Well I don't see any need to introduce incompatible variations. Yeap, there is a problem with verifying uncommented signatures on current signify(1). I don't care. And it's okay if someone does - I've just put my two cents. -- Ivan Markin
