On 20/01/17(Fri) 03:04, Claudio Jeker wrote: > I want to use art routing tables with pf addrs and not sockaddrs. > Art itself does not care but the API requires sockaddr pointers in some > places. This changes those to void *. > > OK? This is step 2 to a new pf_table backend.
What's the problem with uint8_t? If possible I'd prefer keeping that type since it's clear that we're dealing with bytes. I also think that ``an_dst'' is no longer used and can die. The value attached to an art_node is now ``an_rtlist''. This might be renamed and we could use a "void *" since you're not going to use list for pf. That means we could fold ``an_rtlist'' in the union and reduce the size of 'struct art_node'.
