> As faq/current.html[0] grows, each major change is being added at > the very bottom, chronologically. There already are several other > pages where this kind of ordering makes sense, i.e. innovations.html[1]. > > Given the "current" (unintentional pun) nature of changes on the > aforementioned page, it seem like reverse chronological order would > suit it better, as is the case with, i.e. events.html[2].
This page includes remedial actions a current-follower needs, which are generally cut&pasted. A reader decides "Where was I last time", then would intuitively move forward. The proposal doesn't make sense to me.
