> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 19:38:11 +1000
> From: Philip Guenther <[email protected]>
> 
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2017, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> ...
> > Looks ok to me.  However:
> > 
> > > @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ int     _dl_getcwd(char *, size_t);
> > >  int      _dl_utrace(const char *, const void *, size_t);
> > >  int      _dl_getentropy(char *, size_t);
> > >  int      _dl_sendsyslog(const char *, size_t, int);
> > > +__dead
> > > +void     _dl_thrkill(pid_t, int, void *);
> > 
> > Doesn't make sense to have __dead on a separate line here.  There are
> > a couple of those throughout the diff.
> 
> That's how _dl_exit() was declared, with __dead on the preceeding line:
>       __dead
>       void    _dl_exit(int);
> 
> Could change them all...or wait until someone figures out how to move 
> syscall.h up a level and be MI...

fair enough

Reply via email to