On 7 February 2017 at 10:13, Martin Pieuchot <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/02/17(Mon) 17:19, Mike Belopuhov wrote: >> On 6 February 2017 at 17:02, Martin Pieuchot <[email protected]> wrote: >> > PF has its own home-brewed solution for dealing with CPU hogging. It >> > has been introduced in r1.88 of net/pf_table.c and I couldn't find any >> > explanation why it is different than the idiom we use in other places. >> > >> >> The idea was just to be able to load a huge table semi-efficiently. > > Can you explain what you mean with semi-efficiently? >
you'd yield too much as far as i understand. try loading those monster spamd tables on apu/soekris and see if there's a noticeable slowdown. >> I don't think SPCF_SHOULDYIELD existed back then. > > cvs blame tells me otherwise. strange, but i can't rule that out.
