Martin Pieuchot wrote: > PF has its own home-brewed solution for dealing with CPU hogging. It > has been introduced in r1.88 of net/pf_table.c and I couldn't find any > explanation why it is different than the idiom we use in other places.
oh, just because i didn't bother making them all the same. > > So let's use the same idiom, I promise to introduce a macro an unify all > of them once this is in. so i think sched_pause is supposed to be that macro, but gets into the preempt vs yield debate.
