Ingo Schwarze <schwa...@usta.de> writes:

Hello Ingo,

> Hi Gregoire,
>
> Gregoire Jadi wrote on Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:44:41AM +0200:
>> Ingo Schwarze <schwa...@usta.de> writes:
>
>>> Feedback is welcome both on the general idea and on the specific
>>> implementation.
>
> The result of that feeback was "we don't want it, the whole
> idea of changing this is pointless and dangerous", so i deleted
> my patch quite some time ago.

Ok.

> The conversation resulted in a clarification in the manual page,
> though.

Thanks for the clarification. It's clear now it's a "best effort".

>> Thank you for working on this.  I have tested your patch
>> and both `rm -P` and `rm -Pf` work as expected.
>
> Sorry, it won't be committed, it was definitely rejected.
> Besides, it wasn't correct, there were race conditions.
> Working on improving it would be a waste of time.

Ok. So, this issue is closed. :)

Best,

> Yours,
>   Ingo

Reply via email to