On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 06:07:22PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 17:24:42 +0200 > > From: Patrick Wildt <[email protected]> > > > > Hi, > > > > we already do have the sources for LLDB, the only thing left to do is > > add the build infrastructure so that we actually compile all the > > independent pieces and link them together. Aparently LLDB also makes > > use of some of the clang libraries, so those are part of LLDB linking > > dependencies as well. > > > > Since we have no Python in base we have to explicitly disable Python, > > otherwise it will try to use Python headers and probably also link > > against it. > > > > According to kettenis@, debugging core files should work, actually > > running stuff probably won't. Still, having lldb is a first step. > > > > Compiled on amd64, tests on other clang architectures would be nice. > > > > Feedback? ok? > > I would like to get this in. That said, I'm not sure lldb in its > current state is useful enough to ship in 6.4.
Even then I'd still like to put this in so that we can have a go at making it useful. We can still disable it for the release if we see that it wouldn't be reasonable shipping it. So I'd go ahead and commit tomorrow or so if there are no further objections.
