> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 14:28:41 +0200 > From: Patrick Wildt <[email protected]> > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 06:07:22PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 17:24:42 +0200 > > > From: Patrick Wildt <[email protected]> > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > we already do have the sources for LLDB, the only thing left to do is > > > add the build infrastructure so that we actually compile all the > > > independent pieces and link them together. Aparently LLDB also makes > > > use of some of the clang libraries, so those are part of LLDB linking > > > dependencies as well. > > > > > > Since we have no Python in base we have to explicitly disable Python, > > > otherwise it will try to use Python headers and probably also link > > > against it. > > > > > > According to kettenis@, debugging core files should work, actually > > > running stuff probably won't. Still, having lldb is a first step. > > > > > > Compiled on amd64, tests on other clang architectures would be nice. > > > > > > Feedback? ok? > > > > I would like to get this in. That said, I'm not sure lldb in its > > current state is useful enough to ship in 6.4. > > Even then I'd still like to put this in so that we can have a go at > making it useful. We can still disable it for the release if we see > that it wouldn't be reasonable shipping it.
Yes, we can simply drop installing the lldb binary. > So I'd go ahead and commit tomorrow or so if there are no further > objections. Building on armv7 and arm64 right now. Will take a while...
