On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 07:44:01AM -0800, Mike Larkin wrote: > On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 04:37:49PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 01:12:46PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote: > > > the attached diff is another attempt at implementing a pvclock(4) > > > guest driver. This improves the clock on KVM and replaces the need > > > for using the VM-expensive acpihpet(4). > > > > > > > So far I only got positive reports. Where are the problems? ;) > > > > Otherwise: OK? > > > > Reyk > > > > Reads ok. One question - you mention in pvclock.c that this is supported > on i386 and amd64 but I only see GENERIC changes for amd64? > > ok mlarkin in any case, but I'd either add GENERIC changes for i386 or > make this for sure amd64 only.
I'm giving it a shot on my i386 vm.
