On Sat, Jan 05, 2019 at 01:50:22AM +0200, Artturi Alm wrote: > Hi, > > guessing i'm not the only one wondering about these sizes, as w/current > snapshot the font does seem too big for me(on 2560x1440 display, for > which radeondrm(4) has never gotten the size right(giving only 1920x1200)). > > display.part of wsconsctl output w/the diff: > display.type=radeondrm > display.width=1920 > display.height=1200 > display.depth=32 > display.emulations=vt100 > display.col_x_row=120x37 > display.font_wxh=16x32 > display.screentypes=std > display.focus=4 > display.screen_on=250 > display.screen_off=0 > display.vblank=off > display.kbdact=on > display.msact=on > display.outact=on > > lazy(=ugly) not-so-minimal diff below. > > -Artturi >
fwiw., what i have w/o spleen: display.type=radeondrm display.width=1920 display.height=1200 display.depth=32 display.emulations=vt100 display.col_x_row=160x54 display.font_wxh=12x22 display.screentypes=std which is usable, and the wrong width/height doesn't matter so much. i suppose i should have written to bugs@ at this point, with picture showing the size of gaps around 'i', effectively making "libxxx" read like "l i bxxx". -Artturi
