Chris Ross: > Is there a hard reason SR_BOOT_LOADER_SIZE cannot be raised to sometime > larger, perhaps 1024 (instead of the current 320) ?
That size is part of the disk layout. Looking at <dev/softraidvar.h>, the layout of a softraid partition is this: 16 sectors, unused (potential disklabel, boot block) + 64 sectors softraid metadata + 320 sectors boot loader space + 128 sectors boot block space followed by the actual data The boot block space is of dubious usefulness and unused as far as I can tell, so I guess it could be reused to modestly extend the boot loader space if there ever were a pressing reason. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de